PMNV vs. JULB
PMNV (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PMNV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
PMNV vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMNV achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 9.75% return.
PMNV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $150.89K | $164.82K | $229.85K | |
| $156.33 | $165.66 | $6.27K |
PMNV vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMNV PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November | 4.18% | 0.42% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 9.75% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMNV and JULB is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMNV vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMNV vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMNV drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMNV and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMNV | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -5.24% | +3.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -0.77% | +0.56% |
Volatility
PMNV vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMNV | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 6.88% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 6.88% | -4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 6.88% | -4.28% |
PMNV vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMNV vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither PMNV nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PMNV and JULB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMNV.
PMNV and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMNV and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for PMNV and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer