PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMMF vs. SBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMMF vs. SBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PMMF having a 2.14% return and SBIL slightly lower at 2.11%.


PMMF

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.81%
YTD
2.14%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.98%

SBIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
6M
1.77%
YTD
2.11%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.61M$12.34M$15.91M
$37.76M$26.66M$27.81M

PMMF vs. SBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMMF and SBIL is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMMF vs. SBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMMF
PMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIL
SBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMMF vs. SBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMMFSBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+49.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

50.57

13.04

+37.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

156.87

155.37

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,677.66

872.83

+804.83

PMMF vs. SBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMMF Sharpe Ratio is 21.01, which is higher than the SBIL Sharpe Ratio of 15.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMMF and SBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMMF vs. SBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, which is greater than SBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMF and SBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMMFSBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-0.03%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.02%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

PMMF vs. SBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) have volatilities of 0.05% and 0.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMMFSBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.05%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

0.18%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19%

0.26%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.34%

0.26%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.34%

0.26%

+0.08%

PMMF vs. SBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIL's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PMMF vs. SBIL - Dividend Comparison

PMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than SBIL's 3.87% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PMMF and SBIL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIL has higher volatility (0.05%) compared to PMMF (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMMF dropped -0.13% vs SBIL's -0.03%.

On 1-year performance, PMMF leads with 3.89% vs 3.87% for SBIL. On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PMMF has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PMMF.

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.69% for PMMF.

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PMMF and 0.15% for SBIL.

PMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (21.01 vs 15.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMMF and SBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer