PMMF vs. LCTU
PMMF (iShares Prime Money Market ETF) and LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by BlackRock, while LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMMF returned 4.00% vs 25.72% for LCTU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMMF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LCTU.
Performance
PMMF vs. LCTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMMF achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than LCTU's 9.04% return.
PMMF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCTU
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PMMF vs. LCTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF | 1.52% | 3.85% |
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 9.04% | 13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMMF and LCTU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMMF vs. LCTU — Risk / Return Rank
PMMF
LCTU
PMMF vs. LCTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMMF | LCTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 19.72 | 2.10 | +17.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 95.22 | 2.89 | +92.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 38.37 | 1.38 | +37.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 161.17 | 2.75 | +158.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,488.23 | 12.25 | +1,475.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMMF | LCTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72 | 2.10 | +17.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.97 | 0.76 | +11.21 |
Drawdowns
PMMF vs. LCTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum LCTU drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMF and LCTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMMF | LCTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -25.93% | +25.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -9.38% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.74% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -6.32% | +6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.11% | -2.11% |
Volatility
PMMF vs. LCTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) is 0.05%, while BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that PMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMMF | LCTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 3.04% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 9.36% | -9.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 12.30% | -12.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 17.15% | -16.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 17.02% | -16.68% |
PMMF vs. LCTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PMMF vs. LCTU - Dividend Comparison
PMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than LCTU's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.27% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 2.20% |
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF | 3.83% | 3.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMMF and LCTU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCTU has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to PMMF (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMMF dropped -0.13% vs LCTU's -25.93%.
On 1-year performance, LCTU leads with 25.72% vs 4.00% for PMMF. On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PMMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LCTU has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PMMF.
PMMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.93% for LCTU.
PMMF is categorized as Money Market, while LCTU is ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PMMF and 0.15% for LCTU.
PMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.72 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMMF and LCTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer