PMJL vs. PULS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMJL (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMJL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMJL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.

Performance

PMJL vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 1.73% return.

PMJL

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 3.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PULS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 5.61%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July	2.63%	3.39%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.73%	2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and PULS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

PMJL vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 100
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJL vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMJL	PULS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.23	2.51	+0.73

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and PULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMJL	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-5.85%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	0.00%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-0.09%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMJL	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06%	0.41%	+1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.06%	0.70%	+1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.06%	1.33%	+0.73%

PMJL vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMJL vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

PMJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.58%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMJL and PULS in my portfolio?

PMJL and PULS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMJL or PULS?

On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMJL or PULS?

PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMJL or PULS?

PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.00% for PMJL.

What is the main difference between PMJL and PULS?

PMJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PULS is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJL and 0.15% for PULS.