PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMJL vs. CBOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMJL vs. CBOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than CBOY's -0.55% return.


PMJL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBOY

1D
0.06%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. CBOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and CBOY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMJL vs. CBOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMJL vs. CBOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMJLCBOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.25

-0.32

+3.57

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. CBOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum CBOY drawdown of -3.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and CBOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMJLCBOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-3.99%

+2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.36%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-2.18%

+2.06%

Volatility

PMJL vs. CBOY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMJLCBOYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

3.33%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

3.33%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

3.33%

-1.26%

PMJL vs. CBOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOY's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMJL vs. CBOY - Dividend Comparison

PMJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PMJL and CBOY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMJL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMJL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOY.

CBOY has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for PMJL.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJL and 0.69% for CBOY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMJL and CBOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer