PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMJL vs. PBAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMJL vs. PBAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - August (PBAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than PBAU's 4.33% return.


PMJL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
3.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBAU

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.38%
YTD
4.33%
6M
5.01%
1Y
13.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. PBAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and PBAU is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMJL vs. PBAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMJL

PBAU
PBAU Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PBAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBAU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PBAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJL vs. PBAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - August (PBAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMJL vs. PBAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMJLPBAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.23

1.58

+1.65

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. PBAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum PBAU drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and PBAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMJLPBAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-8.87%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.05%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.66%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

Volatility

PMJL vs. PBAU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMJLPBAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

4.91%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

7.21%

-5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.06%

7.21%

-5.15%

PMJL vs. PBAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMJL and PBAU have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

PMJL vs. PBAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMJL nor PBAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMJL and PBAU have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMJL and PBAU have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

PMJL and PBAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMJL and PBAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer