PMAY vs. NVDO
PMAY (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. PMAY is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
PMAY vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAY achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
PMAY
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 11.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMAY vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May | 4.47% | 3.07% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAY and NVDO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAY vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
PMAY
NVDO
PMAY vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMAY | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMAY | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
PMAY vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAY and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAY | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -16.25% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -2.68% | +2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -4.99% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | — | — |
Volatility
PMAY vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAY | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 31.93% | -28.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.65% | 31.93% | -23.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 31.93% | -23.53% |
PMAY vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAY vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
PMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
PMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAY and NVDO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PMAY.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for PMAY.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAY and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for PMAY and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer