PMAY vs. SCHV
PMAY (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PMAY returned 6.96%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for SCHV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
PMAY vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAY achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 16.92% return.
PMAY
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- 1Y
- 9.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
PMAY vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May | 3.56% | 10.26% | 14.08% | 12.05% | -8.08% | 7.80% | 10.74% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 16.92% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 24.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAY and SCHV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between PMAY and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PMAY vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PMAY
SCHV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PMAY
SCHV
Financial Services
PMAY
SCHV
Communication Services
PMAY
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
PMAY
SCHV
Healthcare
PMAY
SCHV
Industrials
PMAY
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
PMAY
SCHV
Energy
PMAY
SCHV
Utilities
PMAY
SCHV
Real Estate
PMAY
SCHV
Basic Materials
PMAY
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAY vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
PMAY
SCHV
PMAY vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAY | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.46 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.30 | 4.22 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.89 | 16.95 | +10.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAY vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAY and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAY | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -37.08% | +24.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.85% | -6.83% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.43% | -15.26% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.05% | -19.78% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -1.20% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -3.82% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 1.70% | -1.35% |
Volatility
PMAY vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is 2.18%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that PMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAY | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 4.25% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 8.76% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 11.14% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.69% | 14.55% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 16.94% | -8.52% |
PMAY vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAY vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
PMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.74% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAY and SCHV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to PMAY (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAY dropped -13.05% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 5-year performance, SCHV leads with 11.14% vs 6.96% for PMAY. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 11.14% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PMAY.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for PMAY.
PMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. PMAY tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAY and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAY and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer