PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAY vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMAY vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAY achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 16.92% return.


PMAY

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.61%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*

SCHV

1D
-1.20%
1M
3.45%
YTD
16.92%
6M
16.13%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAY vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
3.56%10.26%14.08%12.05%-8.08%7.80%10.74%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
16.92%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAY and SCHV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.75

The correlation between PMAY and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PMAY vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PMAY
SCHV

Technology

38.4%
22.5%

Financial Services

11.0%
18.6%

Communication Services

10.8%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
6.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.9%

Industrials

7.9%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
8.3%

Energy

3.2%
6.4%

Utilities

2.1%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.7%

Technology

PMAY
38.4%
SCHV
22.5%

Financial Services

PMAY
11.0%
SCHV
18.6%

Communication Services

PMAY
10.8%
SCHV
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PMAY
10.0%
SCHV
6.6%

Healthcare

PMAY
8.4%
SCHV
10.9%

Industrials

PMAY
7.9%
SCHV
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

PMAY
4.6%
SCHV
8.3%

Energy

PMAY
3.2%
SCHV
6.4%

Utilities

PMAY
2.1%
SCHV
4.2%

Real Estate

PMAY
1.8%
SCHV
3.9%

Basic Materials

PMAY
1.7%
SCHV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMAY vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAY
PMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAY vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMAYSCHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.46

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

4.22

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.89

16.95

+10.94

PMAY vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAY and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMAY vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAY and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMAYSCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-37.08%

+24.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.85%

-6.83%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.43%

-15.26%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.05%

-19.78%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.20%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-3.82%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

1.70%

-1.35%

Volatility

PMAY vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is 2.18%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that PMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMAYSCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

4.25%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.48%

8.76%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

11.14%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.69%

14.55%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.42%

16.94%

-8.52%

PMAY vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMAY vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

PMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.74%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMAY and SCHV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to PMAY (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAY dropped -13.05% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

On 5-year performance, SCHV leads with 11.14% vs 6.96% for PMAY. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 11.14% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PMAY.

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for PMAY.

PMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. PMAY tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAY and 0.04% for SCHV.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMAY and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer