PMAR vs. BOUT
PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) and BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index, while BOUT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PMAR returned 9.61%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for BOUT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BOUT.
Performance
PMAR vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 31.40% return.
PMAR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BOUT
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 31.40%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 36.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PMAR vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 6.36% | 11.82% | 12.83% | 15.95% | -2.65% | 10.96% | 6.64% |
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 31.40% | -6.77% | 18.82% | 13.27% | -22.60% | 22.69% | 57.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAR and BOUT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PMAR and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
PMAR vs. BOUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PMAR
BOUT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PMAR
BOUT
Financial Services
PMAR
BOUT
Communication Services
PMAR
BOUT
Consumer Cyclical
PMAR
BOUT
Healthcare
PMAR
BOUT
Industrials
PMAR
BOUT
Consumer Defensive
PMAR
BOUT
Energy
PMAR
BOUT
Utilities
PMAR
BOUT
Real Estate
PMAR
BOUT
Basic Materials
PMAR
BOUT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAR vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank
PMAR
BOUT
PMAR vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | 1.74 | +1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.52 | 2.38 | +2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.30 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 3.10 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.14 | 9.28 | +13.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 1.74 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 0.43 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.41 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
PMAR vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and BOUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -36.75% | +19.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -11.76% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.32% | -25.31% | +15.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | -28.28% | +17.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -12.30% | +10.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 3.93% | -3.24% |
Volatility
PMAR vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is 0.83%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that PMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 6.06% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.14% | 16.09% | -11.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 20.79% | -15.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.17% | 19.48% | -11.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.73% | 22.94% | -12.21% |
PMAR vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAR vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison
PMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAR and BOUT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOUT has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to PMAR (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAR dropped -17.18% vs BOUT's -36.75%.
On 5-year performance, PMAR leads with 9.61% vs 8.37% for BOUT. On fees, PMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PMAR has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.
BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for PMAR.
PMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. PMAR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index, while BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAR and 0.80% for BOUT.
PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAR and BOUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer