PMAQX vs. TAAGX
PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) and TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PMAQX returned 4.81%/yr vs 18.10%/yr for TAAGX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for TAAGX.
Performance
PMAQX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAQX achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 37.12% return.
PMAQX
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -9.43%
- 1Y
- -9.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- —
TAAGX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 37.12%
- 6M
- 34.03%
- 1Y
- 62.50%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
PMAQX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -8.72% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 37.12% | 16.01% | 36.81% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 27.71% | -12.17% | 17.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAQX and TAAGX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PMAQX and TAAGX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAQX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank
PMAQX
TAAGX
PMAQX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMAQX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.49 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 6.86 | -7.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 27.38 | -28.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMAQX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 3.03 | -3.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.78 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.28 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
PMAQX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAQX and TAAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAQX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -62.13% | +21.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -9.26% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -29.24% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.10% | -34.47% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.65% | 0.00% | -14.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -18.69% | +11.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 2.31% | +6.38% |
Volatility
PMAQX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) is 4.21%, while Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that PMAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAQX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 6.86% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 16.88% | -5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.29% | 20.97% | -6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 23.36% | -4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 22.30% | -2.82% |
PMAQX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAQX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison
PMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than TAAGX's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 6.35% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 2.51% | 3.44% | 17.62% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAQX and TAAGX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAAGX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to PMAQX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAQX dropped -40.56% vs TAAGX's -62.13%.
TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAQX and TAAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer