PMAQX vs. CMPGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) and CMPGX (Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - PMAQX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal, while CMPGX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Principal. Over the past 5 years, PMAQX returned 4.40%/yr vs -0.84%/yr for CMPGX. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PMAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CMPGX.

Performance

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAQX achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than CMPGX's -1.16% return.

PMAQX

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: -4.05%
• YTD: -4.40%
• 1Y: -7.95%
• 3Y*: 9.14%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.19%

CMPGX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.66%
• 6M: -1.45%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 1Y: 1.86%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -0.84%
• 10Y*: 0.38%
• ALL TIME*: 3.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CMPGX Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6	-4.40%	1.71%	23.74%	26.02%	-23.09%	25.29%	18.38%	49.59%	-6.79%	24.68%
CMPGX Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund	-1.16%	7.56%	0.46%	3.98%	-12.34%	-1.80%	2.50%	6.12%	0.52%	1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAQX and CMPGX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.13

Over the past year, PMAQX and CMPGX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PMAQX vs. CMPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMAQX

PMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 1
PMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CMPGX

CMPGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
CMPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CMPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CMPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CMPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CMPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMAQX	CMPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	0.65	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	0.94	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.12	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	0.82	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.91	2.19	-3.10

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAQX Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the CMPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAQX and CMPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than CMPGX's maximum drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAQX and CMPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMAQX	CMPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.56%	-19.56%	-21.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.25%	-3.39%	-15.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.25%	-6.94%	-12.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.10%	-19.10%	-12.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.62%	-4.78%	-5.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-2.42%	-4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.81%	1.27%	+8.54%

Volatility

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Volatility Comparison

Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) at 1.20%. This indicates that PMAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMAQX	CMPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	1.20%	+4.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.03%	3.46%	+8.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	4.30%	+10.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	6.69%	+12.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	5.00%	+14.43%

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CMPGX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMAQX vs. CMPGX - Dividend Comparison

PMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than CMPGX's 3.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMPGX Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund	3.38%	3.44%	2.84%	2.19%	1.35%	1.08%	2.00%	2.43%	2.65%	3.30%	3.76%	2.96%
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6	6.07%	5.80%	6.46%	2.58%	3.18%	7.96%	1.08%	9.14%	12.39%	3.39%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMAQX and CMPGX in my portfolio?

PMAQX and CMPGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMAQX or CMPGX?

PMAQX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to CMPGX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAQX dropped -40.56% vs CMPGX's -19.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.