PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMPGX vs. PLSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPGX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than PLSAX's 11.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CMPGX has underperformed PLSAX with an annualized return of 0.60%, while PLSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.


CMPGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.28%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
0.60%

PLSAX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.61%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMPGX
Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund
0.31%7.56%0.46%3.98%-12.34%-1.80%2.50%6.12%0.52%1.36%
PLSAX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
11.59%17.50%26.46%25.70%-18.41%27.93%17.85%30.97%-4.93%21.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CMPGX and PLSAX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2001

-0.11

The correlation between CMPGX and PLSAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMPGX vs. PLSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPGX
CMPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CMPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CMPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PLSAX
PLSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PLSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMPGXPLSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.30

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

15.41

-9.37

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the PLSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPGX and PLSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMPGXPLSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.49

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.84

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.88

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.43

+0.39

Drawdowns

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPGX drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum PLSAX drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPGX and PLSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMPGXPLSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-55.67%

+36.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-8.94%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.19%

-18.78%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-24.69%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.56%

-33.79%

+14.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

0.00%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-10.15%

+7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.91%

-0.92%

Volatility

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) is 1.69%, while Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that CMPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMPGXPLSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

2.82%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

8.96%

-5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

11.84%

-7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

16.91%

-10.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

17.50%

-12.52%

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMPGX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PLSAX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMPGX vs. PLSAX - Dividend Comparison

CMPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than PLSAX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMPGX
Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund
3.60%3.44%2.84%2.19%1.35%1.08%2.00%2.43%2.65%3.30%3.76%2.96%
PLSAX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
2.47%2.75%4.07%3.90%2.70%13.38%7.35%3.57%7.19%6.72%2.93%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMPGX and PLSAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLSAX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to CMPGX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPGX dropped -19.56% vs PLSAX's -55.67%.

PLSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMPGX and PLSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer