PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMPGX vs. PGDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) and Principal Diversified Income Fund (PGDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPGX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than PGDIX's -0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CMPGX has underperformed PGDIX with an annualized return of 0.60%, while PGDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.01% annualized return.


CMPGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.28%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
0.60%

PGDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMPGX
Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund
0.31%7.56%0.46%3.98%-12.34%-1.80%2.50%6.12%0.52%1.36%
PGDIX
Principal Diversified Income Fund
-0.44%6.50%5.44%8.53%-11.20%8.66%1.89%13.77%-5.38%10.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CMPGX and PGDIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2008

0.26

Over the past year, CMPGX and PGDIX have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMPGX vs. PGDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPGX
CMPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CMPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CMPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PGDIX
PGDIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PGDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PGDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) and Principal Diversified Income Fund (PGDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMPGXPGDIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.80

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.14

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.04

3.72

+2.32

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the PGDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPGX and PGDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMPGXPGDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.51

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.77

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.13

-0.30

Drawdowns

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPGX drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum PGDIX drawdown of -23.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPGX and PGDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMPGXPGDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-23.76%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-3.38%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.19%

-3.56%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-14.60%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.56%

-23.76%

+4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-1.39%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-2.76%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.04%

-0.05%

Volatility

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to Principal Diversified Income Fund (PGDIX) at 0.97%. This indicates that CMPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMPGXPGDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

0.97%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

2.25%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

2.95%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

4.09%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

5.23%

-0.25%

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMPGX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PGDIX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMPGX vs. PGDIX - Dividend Comparison

CMPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than PGDIX's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMPGX
Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund
3.60%3.44%2.84%2.19%1.35%1.08%2.00%2.43%2.65%3.30%3.76%2.96%
PGDIX
Principal Diversified Income Fund
5.83%6.17%6.28%6.47%5.34%4.59%4.63%5.12%5.10%4.67%5.76%5.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMPGX and PGDIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMPGX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to PGDIX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPGX dropped -19.56% vs PGDIX's -23.76%.

CMPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMPGX and PGDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer