PLZTX vs. FCQTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLZTX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6) and FCQTX (American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PLZTX returned 6.61%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for FCQTX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PLZTX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FCQTX.

Performance

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6 (PLZTX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLZTX achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than FCQTX's 11.15% return.

PLZTX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 18.43%
• 3Y*: 13.63%
• 5Y*: 6.61%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

FCQTX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 11.88%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PLZTX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6	7.17%	14.46%	11.11%	14.97%	-16.74%	13.93%	35.55%
FCQTX American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund	11.15%	20.74%	15.64%	21.56%	-19.63%	17.34%	47.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PLZTX and FCQTX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2020	0.96

The correlation between PLZTX and FCQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PLZTX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLZTX

PLZTX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PLZTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PLZTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PLZTX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PLZTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PLZTX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FCQTX

FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6 (PLZTX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLZTX	FCQTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.26	+0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.16	+0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.42	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	2.77	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.82	12.56	+2.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLZTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLZTX and FCQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLZTX	FCQTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.26	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.70	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.12	-0.35

Drawdowns

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLZTX drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum FCQTX drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLZTX and FCQTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLZTX	FCQTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-27.34%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.73%	-9.83%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.07%	-15.53%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-27.34%	+5.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-5.89%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	2.16%	-0.90%

Volatility

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6 (PLZTX) is 2.45%, while American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that PLZTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLZTX	FCQTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	3.53%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.21%	9.66%	-3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.70%	12.03%	-4.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	14.72%	-4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.23%	15.05%	-3.82%

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLZTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLZTX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

PLZTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than FCQTX's 4.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCQTX American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund	4.20%	4.67%	2.80%	1.99%	3.96%	1.54%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PLZTX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6	4.34%	4.66%	3.75%	3.45%	8.09%	5.44%	4.48%	3.73%	3.83%	2.54%	2.28%	1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLZTX and FCQTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, PLZTX and FCQTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PLZTX or FCQTX?

FCQTX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to PLZTX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLZTX dropped -24.54% vs FCQTX's -27.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLZTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.