PLZTX vs. CMPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLZTX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6) and CMPGX (Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - PLZTX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal Funds, while CMPGX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Principal Funds. Over the past 10 years, PLZTX returned 8.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CMPGX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLZTX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CMPGX.

Performance

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6 (PLZTX) and Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLZTX achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly higher than CMPGX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PLZTX has outperformed CMPGX with an annualized return of 8.80%, while CMPGX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.60% annualized return.

PLZTX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 18.43%
• 3Y*: 13.63%
• 5Y*: 6.61%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

CMPGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: 3.51%
• 5Y*: -0.50%
• 10Y*: 0.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLZTX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6	7.17%	14.46%	11.11%	14.97%	-16.74%	13.93%	14.79%	20.97%	-7.35%	16.71%
CMPGX Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund	0.31%	7.56%	0.46%	3.98%	-12.34%	-1.80%	2.50%	6.12%	0.52%	1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PLZTX and CMPGX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2015	0.17

Over the past year, PLZTX and CMPGX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PLZTX vs. CMPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLZTX

PLZTX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PLZTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PLZTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PLZTX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PLZTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PLZTX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CMPGX

CMPGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CMPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CMPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CMPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CMPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CMPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6 (PLZTX) and Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLZTX	CMPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	1.38	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.02	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.25	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	1.77	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.82	6.04	+8.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLZTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the CMPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLZTX and CMPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLZTX	CMPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	1.38	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	-0.08	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.12	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.82	-0.05

Drawdowns

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLZTX drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than CMPGX's maximum drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLZTX and CMPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLZTX	CMPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-19.56%	-4.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.73%	-3.39%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.07%	-8.19%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-19.17%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.54%	-19.56%	-4.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.38%	+3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-2.42%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	0.99%	+0.27%

Volatility

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6 (PLZTX) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) at 1.69%. This indicates that PLZTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLZTX	CMPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	1.69%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.21%	3.18%	+3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.70%	4.38%	+3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	6.65%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.23%	4.98%	+6.25%

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLZTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CMPGX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLZTX vs. CMPGX - Dividend Comparison

PLZTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than CMPGX's 3.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMPGX Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund	3.60%	3.44%	2.84%	2.19%	1.35%	1.08%	2.00%	2.43%	2.65%	3.30%	3.76%	2.96%
PLZTX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund R-6	4.34%	4.66%	3.75%	3.45%	8.09%	5.44%	4.48%	3.73%	3.83%	2.54%	2.28%	1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLZTX and CMPGX in my portfolio?

PLZTX and CMPGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLZTX or CMPGX?

PLZTX has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to CMPGX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLZTX dropped -24.54% vs CMPGX's -19.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLZTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.