PLYY vs. PLTM
PLYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PLYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). PLYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
PLYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLYY achieves a -27.86% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -22.06% return.
PLYY
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -29.48%
- YTD
- -27.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -31.69%
- YTD
- -22.06%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
PLYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | -27.86% | -3.83% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -22.06% | 43.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLYY and PLTM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
PLYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTM
PLYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF (PLYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLYY drawdown since its inception was -39.49%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -44.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLYY and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.49% | -44.07% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.36% | -42.43% | +5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.42% | -18.80% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.72% | — |
Volatility
PLYY vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.28% | 50.98% | -22.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 33.14% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 31.14% | -2.86% |
PLYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
PLYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.40%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | 131.40% | 32.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for PLYY.
PLYY has the higher dividend yield at 131.40%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
PLYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for PLYY and 0.50% for PLTM.
Find the right allocation for PLYY and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer