PLW vs. XLG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).

PLW and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. Both PLW and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

PLW vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLW vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF	-0.06%	5.84%	-2.95%	3.31%	-19.98%	-3.76%	12.55%	10.00%	-0.28%	4.96%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	-7.82%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PLW has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 0.10%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.

PLW

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -3.00%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 1.84%
• 3Y*: 0.38%
• 5Y*: -2.40%
• 10Y*: 0.10%

XLG

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: -4.33%
• YTD: -7.82%
• 6M: -4.84%
• 1Y: 19.36%
• 3Y*: 21.64%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 15.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLW vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

PLW

Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF

XLG

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

Return for Risk

PLW vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLW

PLW Risk / Return Rank: 18
PLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
PLW Omega Ratio Rank: 16
PLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PLW Martin Ratio Rank: 18

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 63
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLW vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLW	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	0.97	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	1.52	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.22	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	1.60	-1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.97	5.67	-4.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLW vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLW and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLW	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	0.97	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	0.74	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	0.83	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.58	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between PLW and XLG is -0.26. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

PLW vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than XLG's 0.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF	3.81%	3.75%	3.56%	2.87%	1.97%	1.15%	1.00%	1.96%	2.14%	2.02%	2.00%	2.14%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.70%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Drawdowns

PLW vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLW	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.70%	-52.39%	+19.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.83%	-12.41%	+6.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.30%	-28.02%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.70%	-30.46%	-2.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.00%	-9.56%	-12.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.53%	-7.69%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	3.49%	-0.98%

Volatility

PLW vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) is 2.69%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that PLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLW	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	5.76%	-3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.43%	10.64%	-6.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.53%	19.97%	-12.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.85%	18.69%	-8.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.11%	18.81%	-9.70%