PLU vs. LINT
PLU (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PLU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLU charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
PLU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLU
- 1D
- -52.17%
- 1M
- -46.80%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT
- 1D
- -23.14%
- 1M
- -28.56%
- YTD
- 398.83%
- 6M
- 291.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF | 9.39% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 278.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLU and LINT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 12.92 | -12.81 |
Drawdowns
PLU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLU drawdown since its inception was -66.28%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLU and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.28% | -49.54% | -16.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.28% | -44.72% | -21.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -20.75% | +1.60% |
Volatility
PLU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.26% | 165.50% | +49.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 215.26% | 165.50% | +49.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 215.26% | 165.50% | +49.76% |
PLU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
PLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.17% | 0.25% |
PLU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLU and LINT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for PLU.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for PLU.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for PLU and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for PLU and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer