PLU vs. PLTG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PLU (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PLU is passively managed, while PLTG is actively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLU charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLTG.

Performance

PLU vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PLU

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -59.80%
• 6M: -67.55%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PLTG

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -11.61%
• 6M: -44.23%
• YTD: -63.05%
• 1Y: -58.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -21.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	$2.36M	$3.34M	$5.05M
PLU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF	$846.68K	$1.41M	$9.38M

PLU vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PLU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF	-58.39%
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	-63.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PLU and PLTG is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026	0.33

Return for Risk

PLU vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLTG

PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 4
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLU vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLU	PLTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.58	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.49	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.94	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.23	—

Drawdowns

PLU vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLU drawdown since its inception was -89.58%, which is greater than PLTG's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLU and PLTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLU	PLTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.58%	-80.11%	-9.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-80.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.51%	-74.89%	-13.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.87%	-35.51%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	49.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLU	PLTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	27.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	82.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.39%	104.68%	+98.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.39%	105.88%	+97.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.39%	105.88%	+97.51%

PLU vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLU vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

PLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.09%.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	49.09%	18.14%
PLU Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLU and PLTG in my portfolio?

PLU and PLTG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLU or PLTG?

On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLU or PLTG?

PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for PLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLU or PLTG?

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.09%, compared with 0.00% for PLU.

What is the main difference between PLU and PLTG?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for PLU and 0.75% for PLTG.