PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLU vs. QQQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLU vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLU

1D
1.64%
1M
-59.80%
6M
-67.55%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QQQT

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.00%
6M
10.64%
YTD
11.65%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$846.68K$1.41M$9.38M
$646.52K$600.88K$778.52K

PLU vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLU and QQQT is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLU vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLU vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLUQQQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

PLU vs. QQQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLU vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLU drawdown since its inception was -89.58%, which is greater than QQQT's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLU and QQQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUQQQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.58%

-22.50%

-67.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.51%

-6.81%

-81.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-4.02%

-30.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

Volatility

PLU vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUQQQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.39%

17.87%

+185.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.39%

20.84%

+182.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.39%

20.84%

+182.55%

PLU vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLU vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison

PLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.87%.


PositionTTM20252024
PLU
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
19.05%21.27%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLU and QQQT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for PLU.

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 19.05%, compared with 0.00% for PLU.

PLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQT is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for PLU and 1.05% for QQQT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLU and QQQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer