PLTZX vs. JRLVX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PLTZX (Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund) and JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PLTZX returned 11.76%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for JRLVX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.01% expense ratio.

Performance

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTZX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 9.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLTZX having a 11.76% annualized return and JRLVX not far behind at 11.46%.

PLTZX

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: 17.32%
• 5Y*: 8.51%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

JRLVX

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 22.43%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund	6.75%	17.76%	16.89%	20.36%	-18.81%	18.12%	16.60%	27.54%	-9.24%	22.68%
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	9.88%	19.25%	14.50%	18.00%	-18.06%	18.45%	16.23%	25.03%	-8.29%	17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTZX and JRLVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2013	0.98

The correlation between PLTZX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PLTZX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTZX

PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 37
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

JRLVX

JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 61
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTZX	JRLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.99	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.73	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.82	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	12.21	-2.74

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTZX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTZX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZX and JRLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTZX	JRLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-32.53%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.70%	-8.50%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.73%	-15.27%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.79%	-25.64%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.01%	-32.53%	-1.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-2.17%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-4.54%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	1.96%	+0.02%

Volatility

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) have volatilities of 5.15% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTZX	JRLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	5.05%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	10.01%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	12.10%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.59%	14.90%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	15.98%	0.00%

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTZX and JRLVX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PLTZX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

PLTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than JRLVX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	3.23%	3.55%	1.89%	2.24%	8.03%	6.00%	4.26%	8.99%	10.96%	4.29%	3.40%	1.90%
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund	7.81%	8.33%	7.85%	4.12%	8.44%	5.29%	3.60%	5.86%	5.75%	2.73%	3.48%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTZX and JRLVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, PLTZX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PLTZX or JRLVX?

PLTZX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to JRLVX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTZX dropped -34.01% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.