PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRLVX vs. FSXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRLVX achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than FSXAX's 9.20% return.


JRLVX

1D
1.10%
1M
1.83%
YTD
11.90%
6M
11.63%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
11.37%

FSXAX

1D
1.01%
1M
2.20%
YTD
9.20%
6M
9.19%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.90%19.25%14.50%12.85%
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
9.20%16.00%10.39%9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JRLVX and FSXAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2023

0.95

The correlation between JRLVX and FSXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRLVX vs. FSXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FSXAX
FSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRLVXFSXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.91

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

12.36

+1.30

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FSXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRLVX and FSXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRLVX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than FSXAX's maximum drawdown of -10.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRLVX and FSXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRLVXFSXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-10.04%

-22.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-6.87%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-10.04%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

0.00%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-1.47%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.62%

+0.34%

Volatility

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) at 4.03%. This indicates that JRLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRLVXFSXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.03%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

8.04%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

9.42%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

9.83%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

9.83%

+6.20%

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRLVX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FSXAX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRLVX vs. FSXAX - Dividend Comparison

JRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than FSXAX's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
2.14%2.21%3.97%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JRLVX and FSXAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FSXAX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRLVX dropped -32.53% vs FSXAX's -10.04%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRLVX and FSXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer