PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRLVX vs. PHTYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRLVX achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than PHTYX's 9.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JRLVX having a 11.66% annualized return and PHTYX not far behind at 11.53%.


JRLVX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.78%
YTD
11.84%
6M
11.18%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
11.66%

PHTYX

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.55%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.84%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
9.55%18.54%16.13%19.35%-18.26%18.37%15.78%24.79%-9.07%19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JRLVX and PHTYX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.98

The correlation between JRLVX and PHTYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRLVX vs. PHTYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PHTYX
PHTYX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PHTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRLVXPHTYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.10

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

13.78

+0.06

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the PHTYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRLVX and PHTYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRLVX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than PHTYX's maximum drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRLVX and PHTYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRLVXPHTYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-30.61%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-7.95%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-15.25%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-24.94%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-30.61%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.83%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-4.56%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.78%

+0.18%

Volatility

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRLVXPHTYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.68%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

9.61%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

11.65%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

14.66%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

14.85%

+1.18%

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRLVX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PHTYX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Dividend Comparison

JRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than PHTYX's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
4.51%4.94%4.41%3.05%9.68%4.72%3.45%3.63%4.66%2.24%2.00%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JRLVX and PHTYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to PHTYX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRLVX dropped -32.53% vs PHTYX's -30.61%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRLVX and PHTYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer