JRLVX vs. PHTYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) and PHTYX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, JRLVX returned 11.31%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for PHTYX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JRLVX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PHTYX.

Performance

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRLVX achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than PHTYX's 10.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JRLVX having a 11.31% annualized return and PHTYX not far behind at 11.21%.

JRLVX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 11.84%
• 6M: 13.03%
• 1Y: 27.45%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: 11.31%

PHTYX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 4.14%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 25.44%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: 11.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	11.84%	19.25%	14.50%	18.00%	-18.06%	18.45%	16.23%	25.03%	-8.29%	17.40%
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund	10.01%	18.54%	16.13%	19.35%	-18.26%	18.37%	15.78%	24.79%	-9.07%	19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JRLVX and PHTYX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014	0.98

The correlation between JRLVX and PHTYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JRLVX vs. PHTYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRLVX

JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 72
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

PHTYX

PHTYX Risk / Return Rank: 69
PHTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PHTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
PHTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PHTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PHTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRLVX	PHTYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.40	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.35	+0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.45	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	3.26	+0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.67	14.94	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the PHTYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRLVX and PHTYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRLVX	PHTYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.40	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.65	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.76	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.69	-0.04

Drawdowns

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRLVX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than PHTYX's maximum drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRLVX and PHTYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRLVX	PHTYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.53%	-30.61%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-7.95%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	-15.25%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	-24.94%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.53%	-30.61%	-1.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-4.57%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	1.73%	+0.18%

Volatility

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRLVX	PHTYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.20%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	8.68%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	10.92%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	14.56%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.99%	14.81%	+1.18%

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRLVX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PHTYX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JRLVX vs. PHTYX - Dividend Comparison

JRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than PHTYX's 4.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	3.18%	3.55%	1.89%	2.24%	8.03%	6.00%	4.26%	8.99%	10.96%	4.29%	3.40%	1.90%
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund	4.49%	4.94%	4.41%	3.05%	9.68%	4.72%	3.45%	3.63%	4.66%	2.24%	2.00%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRLVX and PHTYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, JRLVX and PHTYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JRLVX or PHTYX?

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PHTYX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRLVX dropped -32.53% vs PHTYX's -30.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.