PLTW vs. BUCK
PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -0.85% vs 7.95% for BUCK. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
PLTW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -26.21% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.
PLTW
- 1D
- -7.81%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -26.21%
- 6M
- -26.03%
- 1Y
- -0.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -26.21% | 59.45% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.90% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTW and BUCK is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | -0.00 |
PLTW vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PLTW
BUCK
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PLTW
BUCK
-
Basic Materials
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Communication Services
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Consumer Cyclical
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Consumer Defensive
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Energy
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Financial Services
PLTW
-
BUCK
Healthcare
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Industrials
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Real Estate
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Utilities
PLTW
-
BUCK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
PLTW
BUCK
PLTW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.54 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 6.11 | -6.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 32.31 | -32.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 2.54 | -2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.47 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
PLTW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -5.43% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.29% | -1.31% | -44.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.64% | -0.04% | -39.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | -0.49% | -19.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.21% | 0.25% | +24.96% |
Volatility
PLTW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.32% | 0.70% | +21.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.26% | 1.53% | +44.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.73% | 3.14% | +58.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.85% | 3.49% | +69.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.85% | 3.49% | +69.36% |
PLTW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.30%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.42% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 121.30% | 72.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTW and BUCK have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -46.29% vs BUCK's -5.43%.
On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.95% vs -0.85% for PLTW. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.95% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.30%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.
PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTW and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer