PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTW vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -26.21% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.


PLTW

1D
-7.81%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-26.21%
6M
-26.03%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-26.21%59.45%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and BUCK is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.00

PLTW vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PLTW
BUCK

Technology

20.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PLTW
20.0%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Communication Services

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Energy

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Financial Services

PLTW

-

BUCK
100.0%

Healthcare

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Industrials

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Real Estate

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Utilities

PLTW

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTWBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.54

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

6.11

-6.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

32.31

-32.35

PLTW vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTWBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

2.54

-2.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.47

-1.28

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTWBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-5.43%

-40.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.29%

-1.31%

-44.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.64%

-0.04%

-39.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.57%

-0.49%

-19.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.21%

0.25%

+24.96%

Volatility

PLTW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTWBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.32%

0.70%

+21.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.26%

1.53%

+44.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.73%

3.14%

+58.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.85%

3.49%

+69.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.85%

3.49%

+69.36%

PLTW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.30%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
121.30%72.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTW and BUCK have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -46.29% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.95% vs -0.85% for PLTW. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.95% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.30%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTW and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer