PLTW vs. BUCK

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -31.01% vs 6.70% for BUCK. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.

Performance

PLTW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -44.14% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.29% return.

PLTW

• 1D: -3.51%
• 1M: -21.02%
• YTD: -44.14%
• 6M: -49.89%
• 1Y: -31.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUCK

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 2.48%
• 1Y: 6.70%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-44.14%	28.26%
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF	2.29%	2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and BUCK is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	-0.00

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BUCK

BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 87
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTW	BUCK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	2.27	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.40	3.33	-3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.49	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	5.14	-5.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	27.77	-28.90

PLTW vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and BUCK.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	BUCK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.31%	-5.43%	-48.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.31%	-1.31%	-53.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.31%	0.00%	-54.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.44%	-0.49%	-22.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.46%	0.24%	+27.22%

Volatility

PLTW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 23.27% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.32%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	BUCK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.27%	0.32%	+22.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.44%	1.38%	+45.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.61%	2.98%	+58.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.25%	3.46%	+70.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.25%	3.46%	+70.79%

PLTW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 157.35%, more than BUCK's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF	7.39%	7.59%	8.84%	4.84%	0.59%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	157.35%	72.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTW and BUCK in my portfolio?

PLTW and BUCK have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTW or BUCK?

PLTW has higher volatility (23.27%) compared to BUCK (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -54.31% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

Which ETF is better, PLTW or BUCK?

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 6.70% vs -31.01% for PLTW. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTW or BUCK?

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 6.70% return vs -31.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTW or BUCK?

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTW or BUCK?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 157.35%, compared with 7.39% for BUCK.

What is the main difference between PLTW and BUCK?

PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.35% for BUCK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.