PLTR vs. SCHG
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 39.00%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for SCHG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PLTR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -27.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 2.58% return.
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
PLTR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and SCHG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PLTR and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
SCHG
PLTR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.14 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 3.78 | -4.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -34.59% | -50.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.22% | -16.41% | -21.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -23.39% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | -34.59% | -44.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.22% | -5.33% | -32.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -5.20% | -35.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.23% | 4.96% | +16.27% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.14%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.16% | 5.14% | +12.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.32% | 12.30% | +26.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.83% | 15.95% | +34.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 22.33% | +43.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.75% | 21.58% | +48.17% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and SCHG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer