PLTM vs. TSDD
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. PLTM is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. Over the past year, PLTM returned 14.00% vs -60.33% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
PLTM vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -21.19% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's 0.65% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -10.48%
- 6M
- -32.68%
- YTD
- -21.19%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- -60.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -21.19% | 124.46% | -8.91% | 8.43% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 0.65% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and TSDD is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
TSDD
PLTM vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.91 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.87 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | -1.10 | +1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -99.03% | +54.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | -69.48% | +25.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.78% | -98.85% | +57.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -72.22% | +53.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.20% | 55.05% | -33.85% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 11.42%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 34.22%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 34.22% | -22.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.65% | 62.91% | -22.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.01% | 89.36% | -38.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.16% | 114.44% | -81.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.16% | 114.44% | -83.28% |
PLTM vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTM vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.37% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and TSDD have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (34.22%) compared to PLTM (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -44.07% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, PLTM leads with 14.00% vs -60.33% for TSDD. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 11.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLTM has performed better with a 14.00% return vs -60.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 0.95% for TSDD.
PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer