PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PLTM vs. GLDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and GLDM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

PLTM vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.88%
19.18%
PLTM
GLDM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLTM:

0.22

GLDM:

2.52

Sortino Ratio

PLTM:

0.48

GLDM:

3.23

Omega Ratio

PLTM:

1.05

GLDM:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

PLTM:

0.16

GLDM:

4.73

Martin Ratio

PLTM:

0.53

GLDM:

12.98

Ulcer Index

PLTM:

9.72%

GLDM:

2.95%

Daily Std Dev

PLTM:

23.87%

GLDM:

15.20%

Max Drawdown

PLTM:

-42.32%

GLDM:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

PLTM:

-25.87%

GLDM:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.41% return.


PLTM

YTD

6.43%

1M

2.92%

6M

5.24%

1Y

6.68%

5Y*

-0.39%

10Y*

N/A

GLDM

YTD

8.41%

1M

7.80%

6M

19.08%

1Y

40.34%

5Y*

12.60%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLTM vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio.


PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
Expense ratio chart for PLTM: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for GLDM: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLTM vs. GLDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLTM is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLTM is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLTM is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLTM is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLTM is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLTM is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLDM is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLDM is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLDM is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLTM vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.222.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.483.23
The chart of Omega ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.051.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.164.73
The chart of Martin ratio for PLTM, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.000.5312.98
PLTM
GLDM

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.22
2.52
PLTM
GLDM

Dividends

PLTM vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTM nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-25.87%
0
PLTM
GLDM

Volatility

PLTM vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 4.03%. This indicates that PLTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.55%
4.03%
PLTM
GLDM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab