PLTM vs. PLTU
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and PLTU (Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while PLTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. PLTM is passively managed, while PLTU is actively managed. Over the past year, PLTM returned 13.57% vs -42.39% for PLTU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for PLTU.
Performance
PLTM vs. PLTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -22.06% return, which is significantly higher than PLTU's -57.34% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -31.69%
- YTD
- -22.06%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTU
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -57.71%
- YTD
- -57.34%
- 1Y
- -42.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM vs. PLTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -22.06% | 124.46% | -3.41% |
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF | -57.34% | 223.17% | 14.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and PLTU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. PLTU — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
PLTU
PLTM vs. PLTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | PLTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.00 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | -0.54 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | -0.93 | +1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. PLTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, smaller than the maximum PLTU drawdown of -79.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and PLTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | PLTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -79.43% | +35.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | -79.43% | +35.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.43% | -70.34% | +27.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -34.38% | +15.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.72% | 45.48% | -24.76% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. PLTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) is 11.51%, while Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) has a volatility of 32.91%. This indicates that PLTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | PLTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.51% | 32.91% | -21.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.48% | 79.51% | -39.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.98% | 103.12% | -52.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 125.99% | -92.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 125.99% | -94.85% |
PLTM vs. PLTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTU's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTM vs. PLTU - Dividend Comparison
PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF | 55.89% | 23.29% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and PLTU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTU has higher volatility (32.91%) compared to PLTM (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -44.07% vs PLTU's -79.43%.
On 1-year performance, PLTM leads with 13.57% vs -42.39% for PLTU. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PLTM has been the lower-risk option at 11.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLTM has performed better with a 13.57% return vs -42.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for PLTU.
PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 55.89%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while PLTU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 0.86% for PLTU.
PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and PLTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer