PLTM vs. BITI
PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PLTM returned 20.37%/yr vs -31.77%/yr for BITI. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PLTM charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
PLTM vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.
PLTM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- -22.81%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.60%
BITI
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- 22.77%
- YTD
- 27.11%
- 1Y
- 58.64%
- 3Y*
- -31.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.10M | $26.49M | $38.71M | |
| $1.27M | $1.47M | $3.03M |
PLTM vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -19.56% | 124.46% | -8.91% | -8.10% | 14.86% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 27.11% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTM and BITI is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.20 |
The correlation between PLTM and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTM vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
PLTM
BITI
PLTM vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTM | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.53 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 6.17 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTM vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -44.07%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTM | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -92.16% | +48.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | -25.28% | -18.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.07% | -84.63% | +40.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.58% | -86.12% | +45.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -68.59% | +49.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.75% | 10.35% | +12.40% |
Volatility
PLTM vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 9.19% and 9.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTM | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 9.13% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.75% | 33.31% | +5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.54% | 44.23% | +6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 52.03% | -18.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 52.03% | -20.89% |
PLTM vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTM vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.17% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTM and BITI have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTM has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to BITI (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTM dropped -44.07% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, PLTM leads with 20.37% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PLTM has performed better with a 20.37% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
PLTM is categorized as Precious Metals, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. PLTM tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PLTM and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTM and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer