PLTG vs. HDV
PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. PLTG is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -24.67% vs 20.35% for HDV. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. PLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
PLTG vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -47.23% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.69% return.
PLTG
- 1D
- -13.32%
- 1M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- -47.23%
- 6M
- -47.68%
- 1Y
- -24.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
PLTG vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -47.23% | 86.53% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 9.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTG and HDV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTG vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
PLTG
HDV
PLTG vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.36 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 3.95 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 11.02 | -11.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 2.10 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.72 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
PLTG vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.02% | -37.04% | -31.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.02% | -5.18% | -63.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.14% | -2.54% | -61.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.36% | -3.09% | -27.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.15% | 1.85% | +38.30% |
Volatility
PLTG vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a higher volatility of 36.64% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.19%. This indicates that PLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.64% | 3.19% | +33.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.89% | 7.56% | +70.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.03% | 9.73% | +93.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.00% | 12.82% | +93.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.00% | 15.73% | +90.27% |
PLTG vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTG vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.37%, more than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 34.37% | 18.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTG and HDV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTG has higher volatility (36.64%) compared to HDV (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -69.02% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 1-year performance, HDV leads with 20.35% vs -24.67% for PLTG. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDV has performed better with a 20.35% return vs -24.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PLTG.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 34.37%, compared with 2.91% for HDV.
PLTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLTG and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTG and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer