PLTG vs. ARMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -54.35% vs 232.12% for ARMG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

PLTG vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -65.23% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 647.02% return.

PLTG

• 1D: -4.81%
• 1M: -30.69%
• YTD: -65.23%
• 6M: -71.20%
• 1Y: -54.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMG

• 1D: -20.34%
• 1M: 24.90%
• YTD: 647.02%
• 6M: 611.39%
• 1Y: 232.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTG vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	-65.23%	100.70%
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	647.02%	-24.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTG and ARMG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

PLTG vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTG

PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 4
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 56
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTG vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTG	ARMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	1.65	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	2.61	-2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.33	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	3.43	-4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	5.98	-7.24

PLTG vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTG and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTG vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -76.37%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and ARMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTG	ARMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.37%	-80.28%	+3.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.37%	-68.13%	-8.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.37%	-31.86%	-44.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.02%	-51.77%	+19.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.16%	39.00%	+4.16%

Volatility

PLTG vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) is 38.03%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 71.55%. This indicates that PLTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTG	ARMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.03%	71.55%	-33.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.49%	117.30%	-38.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.77%	141.46%	-38.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.82%	143.77%	-37.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.82%	143.77%	-37.95%

PLTG vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTG and ARMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

PLTG vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.16%, more than ARMG's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	0.65%	4.86%
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	52.16%	18.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTG and ARMG in my portfolio?

PLTG and ARMG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTG or ARMG?

ARMG has higher volatility (71.55%) compared to PLTG (38.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -76.37% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

Which ETF is better, PLTG or ARMG?

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 232.12% vs -54.35% for PLTG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTG has been the lower-risk option at 38.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTG or ARMG?

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 232.12% return vs -54.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTG or ARMG?

PLTG and ARMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTG or ARMG?

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 52.16%, compared with 0.65% for ARMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.