PLTG vs. BNKU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PLTG is actively managed, while BNKU is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -22.13% vs 107.99% for BNKU. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.

Performance

PLTG vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -47.61% return, which is significantly lower than BNKU's 8.32% return.

PLTG

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 4.26%
• YTD: -47.61%
• 6M: -49.25%
• 1Y: -22.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNKU

• 1D: 10.09%
• 1M: 13.36%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 19.85%
• 1Y: 107.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTG vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	-47.61%	86.53%
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	8.32%	151.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTG and BNKU is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

PLTG vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTG

PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 9
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 50
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTG vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTG	BNKU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.89	-2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	2.26	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.30	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	2.65	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	7.00	-7.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTG vs. BNKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the BNKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTG and BNKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTG	BNKU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	1.89	-2.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.59	-0.61

Drawdowns

PLTG vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and BNKU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTG	BNKU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.02%	-58.03%	-10.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.02%	-40.97%	-28.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.40%	-8.18%	-56.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-16.53%	-13.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.34%	15.49%	+24.85%

Volatility

PLTG vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a higher volatility of 33.39% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) at 16.53%. This indicates that PLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTG	BNKU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.39%	16.53%	+16.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.78%	46.00%	+31.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.03%	57.51%	+45.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.81%	73.26%	+32.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.81%	73.26%	+32.55%

PLTG vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTG vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison

PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.62%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	34.62%	18.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTG and BNKU in my portfolio?

PLTG and BNKU have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTG or BNKU?

PLTG has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to BNKU (16.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -69.02% vs BNKU's -58.03%.

Which ETF is better, PLTG or BNKU?

On 1-year performance, BNKU leads with 107.99% vs -22.13% for PLTG. On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 16.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTG or BNKU?

Over the 1-year period, BNKU has performed better with a 107.99% return vs -22.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTG or BNKU?

PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTG or BNKU?

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 34.62%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between PLTG and BNKU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLTG and 0.95% for BNKU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.