PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLSIX vs. JLKYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSIX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSIX has underperformed JLKYX with an annualized return of 5.21%, while JLKYX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


PLSIX

1D
0.58%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.97%
6M
4.14%
1Y
10.85%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
5.21%

JLKYX

1D
1.17%
1M
2.21%
YTD
12.46%
6M
12.87%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLSIX
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund
3.97%10.46%8.16%10.93%-13.11%4.40%10.19%12.77%-3.15%8.73%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
12.46%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSIX and JLKYX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.85

The correlation between PLSIX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLSIX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLSIX
PLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLSIXJLKYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.09

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

13.41

-2.29

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSIX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than JLKYX's maximum drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSIX and JLKYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLSIXJLKYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-32.55%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.30%

-9.16%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

-16.11%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-25.75%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.93%

-32.55%

+14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.42%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-4.65%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

2.11%

-1.14%

Volatility

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) is 2.36%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that PLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLSIXJLKYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

5.11%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

10.57%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

12.77%

-7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.89%

15.34%

-8.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.92%

16.26%

-10.34%

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLSIX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLSIX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

PLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than JLKYX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.21%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%
PLSIX
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund
5.57%5.79%6.17%2.59%5.27%7.76%3.80%5.45%7.67%4.76%2.50%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PLSIX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLKYX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to PLSIX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSIX dropped -40.52% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLSIX and JLKYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer