PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKYX vs. PLTQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
-4.04%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
-3.64%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%19.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKYX achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than PLTQX's -3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, JLKYX has outperformed PLTQX with an annualized return of 10.03%, while PLTQX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.


JLKYX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
-4.04%
6M
-1.30%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
10.03%

PLTQX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
13.91%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKYX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTQX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JLKYX vs. PLTQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLKYXPLTQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.06

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

1.58

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.25

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.13

6.25

-0.12

JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the PLTQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKYX and PLTQX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLKYXPLTQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.06

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.53

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.68

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.62

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between JLKYX and PLTQX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Dividend Comparison

JLKYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than PLTQX's 4.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.76%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.67%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%

Drawdowns

JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKYX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than PLTQX's maximum drawdown of -29.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKYX and PLTQX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKYXPLTQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-29.05%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-10.05%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-24.18%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

-29.05%

-3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.16%

-7.29%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-4.46%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.02%

+0.43%

Volatility

JLKYX vs. PLTQX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) at 4.22%. This indicates that JLKYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JLKYXPLTQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.22%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

7.48%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

13.33%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

13.32%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

13.75%

+2.39%