PLRZ vs. HYMC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PLRZ (Polyrizon Ltd) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. PLRZ operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, PLRZ returned 72.02% vs 462.82% for HYMC. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

PLRZ vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polyrizon Ltd (PLRZ) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLRZ achieves a 32.51% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's -17.84% return.

PLRZ

• 1D: -3.18%
• 1M: -18.48%
• 6M: -2.26%
• YTD: 32.51%
• 1Y: 72.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -95.38%

HYMC

• 1D: -2.69%
• 1M: -17.32%
• 6M: -47.71%
• YTD: -17.84%
• 1Y: 462.82%
• 3Y*: 63.48%
• 5Y*: -3.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -17.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	$28.70M	$31.30M	$59.64M
PLRZ Polyrizon Ltd	$949.68K	$804.92K	$608.05K

PLRZ vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLRZ Polyrizon Ltd	32.51%	-99.74%	32.32%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	-17.84%	975.57%	-13.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PLRZ and HYMC is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap PLRZ : $12.60M HYMC : $1.82B
EPS PLRZ : -$2.56 HYMC : -$1.18
PB Ratio PLRZ : 0.86 HYMC : 7.12
Total Revenue (TTM) PLRZ : $0.00 HYMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) PLRZ : -$459.00K HYMC : -$4.51M
EBITDA (TTM) PLRZ : -$4.45M HYMC : -$81.55M

Return for Risk

PLRZ vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLRZ

PLRZ Risk / Return Rank: 71
PLRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PLRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PLRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PLRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PLRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 97
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLRZ vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polyrizon Ltd (PLRZ) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLRZ	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	4.21	-3.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.75	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.44	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	7.52	-6.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	16.32	-14.00

PLRZ vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLRZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 4.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLRZ and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLRZ vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLRZ drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLRZ and HYMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLRZ	HYMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.94%	-98.89%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.24%	-66.93%	+8.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-66.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-93.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.77%	-87.65%	-12.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.28%	-63.72%	-24.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.06%	30.78%	-8.72%

Volatility

PLRZ vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

Polyrizon Ltd (PLRZ) has a higher volatility of 30.52% compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) at 24.42%. This indicates that PLRZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLRZ	HYMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.52%	24.42%	+6.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.32%	77.08%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.66%	119.53%	+84.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	358.37%	152.74%	+205.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	358.37%	122.43%	+235.94%

Dividends

PLRZ vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLRZ nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLRZ and HYMC in my portfolio?

PLRZ and HYMC have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLRZ or HYMC?

PLRZ has higher volatility (30.52%) compared to HYMC (24.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLRZ dropped -99.94% vs HYMC's -98.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.21 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.