PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLRZ vs. ABAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polyrizon Ltd (PLRZ) and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLRZ achieves a 32.51% return, which is significantly higher than ABAT's -37.43% return.


PLRZ

1D
-3.18%
1M
-18.48%
6M
-2.26%
YTD
32.51%
1Y
72.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-95.38%

ABAT

1D
2.45%
1M
-25.62%
6M
-48.27%
YTD
-37.43%
1Y
-5.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-45.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.01M$8.06M$19.57M
$949.68K$804.92K$608.05K

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PLRZ
Polyrizon Ltd
32.51%-99.74%32.32%
ABAT
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock
-37.43%35.77%146.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PLRZ and ABAT is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLRZ:

$12.60M

ABAT:

$285.11M

EPS

PLRZ:

-$2.56

ABAT:

-$0.51

PB Ratio

PLRZ:

0.86

ABAT:

2.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLRZ:

$0.00

ABAT:

$16.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLRZ:

-$459.00K

ABAT:

-$6.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

PLRZ:

-$4.45M

ABAT:

-$62.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLRZ vs. ABAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLRZ
PLRZ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PLRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PLRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ABAT
ABAT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ABAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABAT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ABAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABAT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polyrizon Ltd (PLRZ) and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLRZABATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.11

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

-0.05

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

-0.06

+2.38

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLRZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the ABAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLRZ and ABAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLRZ drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than ABAT's maximum drawdown of -93.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLRZ and ABAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLRZABATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-93.56%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.24%

-81.99%

+23.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.77%

-82.29%

-17.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.28%

-77.67%

-10.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.06%

60.96%

-38.90%

Volatility

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Volatility Comparison

Polyrizon Ltd (PLRZ) has a higher volatility of 30.52% compared to American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) at 18.32%. This indicates that PLRZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLRZABATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.52%

18.32%

+12.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.32%

63.31%

+13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.66%

126.50%

+77.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

358.37%

120.53%

+237.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

358.37%

120.53%

+237.84%

Dividends

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLRZ nor ABAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PLRZ vs. ABAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polyrizon Ltd and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLRZ and ABAT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLRZ has higher volatility (30.52%) compared to ABAT (18.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLRZ dropped -99.94% vs ABAT's -93.56%.

PLRZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLRZ and ABAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer