PLRIX vs. RPLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX).
PLRIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 30, 2006. RPLCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 2, 2013.
Performance
PLRIX vs. RPLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLRIX vs. RPLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLRIX PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund | -1.66% | 8.78% | -2.18% | 7.24% | -28.32% | -1.53% | 17.77% | 18.62% | -3.83% | 12.79% |
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | -2.19% | 7.65% | -1.84% | 9.05% | -27.00% | -0.19% | 16.73% | 23.72% | -6.27% | 11.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLRIX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly higher than RPLCX's -2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PLRIX has underperformed RPLCX with an annualized return of 1.87%, while RPLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.24% annualized return.
PLRIX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 1.84%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
RPLCX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 2.11%
- 5Y*
- -2.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLRIX vs. RPLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLRIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RPLCX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLRIX vs. RPLCX — Risk / Return Rank
PLRIX
RPLCX
PLRIX vs. RPLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLRIX | RPLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.40 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 0.61 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.77 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 1.99 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLRIX | RPLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.40 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | -0.19 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.21 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.33 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLRIX and RPLCX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLRIX vs. RPLCX - Dividend Comparison
PLRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than RPLCX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLRIX PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund | 4.24% | 4.57% | 3.75% | 3.19% | 3.32% | 6.55% | 13.35% | 11.38% | 5.19% | 6.51% | 9.97% | 8.51% |
RPLCX T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund | 5.00% | 5.32% | 5.17% | 4.15% | 3.54% | 6.09% | 7.16% | 13.58% | 4.33% | 4.07% | 3.79% | 4.70% |
Drawdowns
PLRIX vs. RPLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than RPLCX's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLRIX and RPLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLRIX | RPLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -35.21% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -5.80% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.81% | -35.21% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.41% | -35.21% | -2.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.03% | -19.31% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -10.01% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.25% | +0.66% |
Volatility
PLRIX vs. RPLCX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Long Duration Credit Fund (RPLCX) at 3.32%. This indicates that PLRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLRIX | RPLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.32% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 5.32% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 8.79% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 11.64% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.45% | 10.59% | +0.86% |