PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLRIX vs. FFHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLRIX achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than FFHCX's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PLRIX has underperformed FFHCX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while FFHCX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.67% annualized return.


PLRIX

1D
0.42%
1M
2.62%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.59%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
-3.34%
10Y*
1.78%

FFHCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.52%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLRIX
PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund
1.04%8.78%-2.18%7.24%-28.32%-1.53%17.77%18.62%-3.83%12.79%
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.87%6.02%8.49%13.19%-1.55%5.66%2.54%9.42%1.36%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PLRIX and FFHCX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2011

0.03

The correlation between PLRIX and FFHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLRIX vs. FFHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLRIX
PLRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PLRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PLRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FFHCX
FFHCX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FFHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLRIXFFHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.91

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

5.71

-4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

20.52

-17.64

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLRIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FFHCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLRIX and FFHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than FFHCX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLRIX and FFHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLRIXFFHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

-21.45%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-1.14%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-3.12%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.81%

-5.81%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.41%

-21.45%

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-0.46%

-19.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-0.92%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

0.32%

+2.28%

Volatility

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX) at 0.72%. This indicates that PLRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLRIXFFHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

0.72%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

1.84%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.48%

2.61%

+5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

3.10%

+9.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.47%

4.17%

+7.30%

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLRIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FFHCX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Dividend Comparison

PLRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than FFHCX's 7.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFHCX
Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.70%8.11%8.46%9.47%3.83%3.64%4.61%5.92%6.68%4.80%5.16%4.37%
PLRIX
PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund
4.67%4.57%3.75%3.19%3.32%6.55%13.35%11.38%5.19%6.51%9.97%8.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLRIX and FFHCX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLRIX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to FFHCX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLRIX dropped -37.41% vs FFHCX's -21.45%.

FFHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLRIX and FFHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer