PLRIX vs. FFHCX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX).
PLRIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 30, 2006. FFHCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Performance
PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLRIX PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund | -1.66% | 8.78% | -2.18% | 7.24% | -28.32% | -1.53% | 17.77% | 18.62% | -3.83% | 12.79% |
FFHCX Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.54% | 6.02% | 8.49% | 13.19% | -1.55% | 5.66% | 2.54% | 9.42% | 1.36% | 4.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLRIX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly lower than FFHCX's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PLRIX has underperformed FFHCX with an annualized return of 1.87%, while FFHCX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.78% annualized return.
PLRIX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 1.84%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
FFHCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLRIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FFHCX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLRIX vs. FFHCX — Risk / Return Rank
PLRIX
FFHCX
PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLRIX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 1.65 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 2.45 | -1.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.58 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.04 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 10.03 | -8.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLRIX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 1.65 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 1.92 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 1.40 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.36 | -0.92 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLRIX and FFHCX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Dividend Comparison
PLRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than FFHCX's 7.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLRIX PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund | 4.24% | 4.57% | 3.75% | 3.19% | 3.32% | 6.55% | 13.35% | 11.38% | 5.19% | 6.51% | 9.97% | 8.51% |
FFHCX Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.31% | 8.11% | 8.46% | 9.47% | 3.83% | 3.64% | 4.61% | 5.92% | 6.68% | 4.80% | 5.16% | 4.37% |
Drawdowns
PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than FFHCX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLRIX and FFHCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLRIX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -21.45% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -2.71% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.81% | -5.81% | -31.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.41% | -21.45% | -15.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.03% | -0.73% | -21.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -0.94% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 0.55% | +2.36% |
Volatility
PLRIX vs. FFHCX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund (PLRIX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX) at 0.68%. This indicates that PLRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLRIX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 0.68% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 1.85% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 3.45% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 3.06% | +9.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.45% | 4.15% | +7.30% |