PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ABM vs. CTAS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ABMCTAS
YTD Return-0.76%10.80%
1Y Return7.82%49.26%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.98%25.19%
5Y Return (Ann)5.44%26.30%
10Y Return (Ann)7.10%29.14%
Sharpe Ratio0.302.86
Daily Std Dev33.72%18.55%
Max Drawdown-59.61%-65.35%
Current Drawdown-14.94%-3.03%

Fundamentals


ABMCTAS
Market Cap$2.79B$67.60B
EPS$3.91$14.46
PE Ratio11.2646.07
PEG Ratio4.453.79
Revenue (TTM)$8.17B$9.41B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.13B$3.63B
EBITDA (TTM)$459.70M$2.30B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ABM and CTAS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ABM vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ABM achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 10.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ABM has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 7.10%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 29.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%70,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3,545.39%
65,674.51%
ABM
CTAS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABM Industries Incorporated

Cintas Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABM vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABM, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABM, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ABM, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABM, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ABM, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.70
CTAS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 4.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.57
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 6.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 19.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.80

ABM vs. CTAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABM Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ABM and CTAS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.30
2.86
ABM
CTAS

Dividends

ABM vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

ABM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than CTAS's 0.78% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ABM
ABM Industries Incorporated
2.02%1.96%1.76%1.86%1.47%2.40%2.18%1.80%1.62%1.69%2.18%2.12%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
0.78%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.20%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%2.17%1.28%

Drawdowns

ABM vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABM drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, smaller than the maximum CTAS drawdown of -65.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABM and CTAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-14.94%
-3.03%
ABM
CTAS

Volatility

ABM vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 3.40%. This indicates that ABM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
4.05%
3.40%
ABM
CTAS

Financials

ABM vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ABM Industries Incorporated and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items