PLOO vs. HOOG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PLOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while HOOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLOO charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.

Performance

PLOO vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOO achieves a -17.21% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -40.04% return.

PLOO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: -17.31%
• YTD: -17.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -16.65%
• 1M: 13.72%
• 6M: -36.00%
• YTD: -40.04%
• 1Y: -45.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOO vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF	-17.21%	1.60%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-40.04%	-23.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PLOO and HOOG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

PLOO vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 8
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLOO vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLOO	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.37	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.04	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.53	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.78	—

Drawdowns

PLOO vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOO drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOO and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLOO	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.59%	-86.94%	+53.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-86.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.26%	-72.03%	+47.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-40.55%	+23.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	58.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLOO	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	40.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	106.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.75%	139.20%	-91.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.75%	144.48%	-96.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.75%	144.48%	-96.73%

PLOO vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLOO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLOO vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

PLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.57%, more than HOOG's 20.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	20.52%	12.30%
PLOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF	27.57%	22.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLOO and HOOG in my portfolio?

PLOO and HOOG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLOO or HOOG?

On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLOO or HOOG?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PLOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLOO or HOOG?

PLOO has the higher dividend yield at 27.57%, compared with 20.52% for HOOG.

What is the main difference between PLOO and HOOG?

PLOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while HOOG is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PLOO and 0.75% for HOOG.