PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLFRX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLFRX achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PLFRX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 5.11%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.87% annualized return.


PLFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.32%
6M
2.15%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
5.11%

FFANX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.73%
YTD
7.52%
6M
8.05%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
6.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
1.32%6.68%8.38%13.94%-2.01%4.36%1.26%8.30%0.39%4.33%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.52%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PLFRX and FFANX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLFRX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFRX
PLFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PLFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLFRXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.53

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.44

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

15.00

-2.76

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFRX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLFRXFFANXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.71

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.13

0.71

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.36

0.90

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.68

+0.79

Drawdowns

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFRX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFRX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLFRXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-31.69%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-5.20%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.17%

-7.55%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.44%

-18.52%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

-18.52%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-3.80%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

1.19%

-0.69%

Volatility

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) is 0.61%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that PLFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLFRXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

2.28%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

5.45%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

6.60%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.78%

7.86%

-5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

7.70%

-3.93%

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLFRX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

PLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
7.08%7.18%8.47%8.92%4.39%3.65%3.68%5.10%5.03%4.46%4.21%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLFRX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFANX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to PLFRX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFRX dropped -18.75% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLFRX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer