PLFRX vs. GLIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX).
PLFRX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011. GLIFX is managed by Lazard.
Performance
PLFRX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLFRX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | -1.34% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 13.94% | -2.01% | 4.36% | 1.26% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 4.33% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 5.89% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLFRX achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than GLIFX's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PLFRX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 5.04%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
PLFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
GLIFX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLFRX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLFRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLFRX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
PLFRX
GLIFX
PLFRX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLFRX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 2.23 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.42 | 2.83 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.43 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.74 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 11.44 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLFRX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.23 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.05 | 1.14 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.35 | 0.75 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.85 | +0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLFRX and GLIFX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PLFRX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison
PLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than GLIFX's 6.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | 6.59% | 7.18% | 8.47% | 8.92% | 4.39% | 3.65% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 5.03% | 4.46% | 4.21% | 4.52% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.37% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Drawdowns
PLFRX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLFRX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum GLIFX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFRX and GLIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLFRX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -29.65% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -9.00% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.44% | -17.15% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.75% | -29.65% | +10.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -7.05% | +5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -3.35% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.16% | -1.60% |
Volatility
PLFRX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) is 0.76%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that PLFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLFRX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 4.58% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.79% | 7.35% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76% | 10.71% | -7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 10.70% | -7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 13.25% | -9.50% |