PortfoliosLab logo
PLFRX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PLFRX and FFRHX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

PLFRX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

75.00%80.00%85.00%90.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
90.69%
78.62%
PLFRX
FFRHX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLFRX:

1.99

FFRHX:

1.58

Sortino Ratio

PLFRX:

3.88

FFRHX:

2.53

Omega Ratio

PLFRX:

1.79

FFRHX:

1.60

Calmar Ratio

PLFRX:

2.57

FFRHX:

1.51

Martin Ratio

PLFRX:

12.57

FFRHX:

7.22

Ulcer Index

PLFRX:

0.44%

FFRHX:

0.69%

Daily Std Dev

PLFRX:

2.80%

FFRHX:

3.14%

Max Drawdown

PLFRX:

-18.75%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

PLFRX:

-0.17%

FFRHX:

-1.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLFRX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PLFRX has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 4.75%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.


PLFRX

YTD

0.55%

1M

0.83%

6M

1.98%

1Y

5.45%

5Y*

7.32%

10Y*

4.75%

FFRHX

YTD

-0.61%

1M

0.22%

6M

1.02%

1Y

4.96%

5Y*

7.66%

10Y*

4.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLFRX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for PLFRX: current value is 0.68%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
PLFRX: 0.68%
Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value is 0.67%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FFRHX: 0.67%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLFRX vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLFRX is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLFRX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLFRX is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLFRX is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLFRX is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLFRX is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLFRX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLFRX, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
PLFRX: 1.95
FFRHX: 1.58
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLFRX, currently valued at 3.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PLFRX: 3.81
FFRHX: 2.53
The chart of Omega ratio for PLFRX, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
PLFRX: 1.77
FFRHX: 1.60
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLFRX, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
PLFRX: 2.52
FFRHX: 1.51
The chart of Martin ratio for PLFRX, currently valued at 12.32, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
PLFRX: 12.32
FFRHX: 7.22

The current PLFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFRX and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.95
1.58
PLFRX
FFRHX

Dividends

PLFRX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

PLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than FFRHX's 7.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
7.96%8.47%8.92%5.66%3.93%4.06%5.14%5.08%4.46%4.22%4.51%4.58%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.48%8.33%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%

Drawdowns

PLFRX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFRX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFRX and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-3.50%-3.00%-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.17%
-1.33%
PLFRX
FFRHX

Volatility

PLFRX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) is 1.55%, while Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that PLFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.55%
2.08%
PLFRX
FFRHX