PLDR vs. DCMT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PLDR (Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLDR is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. PLDR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

PLDR vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PLDR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 21.60%
• YTD: 25.74%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLDR vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	1.69%	12.03%	19.45%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	25.74%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and DCMT is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.02

The correlation between PLDR and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PLDR vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 51
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLDR	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.52	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.11	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.45	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PLDR	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-15.96%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-9.74%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.51%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLDR	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.80%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.03%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.03%	—

PLDR vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLDR vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.92%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	0.37%	0.37%	0.38%	0.56%	0.63%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLDR and DCMT in my portfolio?

PLDR and DCMT have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLDR or DCMT?

On fees, PLDR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLDR or DCMT?

PLDR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLDR or DCMT?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.37% for PLDR.

What is the main difference between PLDR and DCMT?

PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.66% for DCMT.