PKX vs. MT
PKX (POSCO Holdings Inc.) and MT (ArcelorMittal) are both stocks. Both operate in the Steel industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, PKX returned 2.82%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for MT. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PKX vs. MT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than MT's 54.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PKX has underperformed MT with an annualized return of 2.82%, while MT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.
PKX
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -10.37%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- -21.67%
- 5Y*
- -4.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.67%
MT
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 30.58%
- YTD
- 54.65%
- 1Y
- 129.25%
- 3Y*
- 37.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $109.13M | $116.87M | $127.49M | |
| $19.55M | $20.07M | $24.57M |
PKX vs. MT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | -0.08% | 27.24% | -52.98% | 77.86% | -3.49% | -3.40% | 25.14% | -7.86% | -29.68% | 51.95% |
MT ArcelorMittal | 54.65% | 100.13% | -16.92% | 10.28% | -16.44% | 40.29% | 30.56% | -14.14% | -35.85% | 47.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKX and MT is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 1997 | 0.45 |
The correlation between PKX and MT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PKX:
$16.08B
MT:
$53.38B
PKX:
₩612.19
MT:
$3.82
PKX:
124.36
MT:
18.34
PKX:
0.94
MT:
0.86
PKX:
0.51
MT:
0.97
PKX:
₩51.56T
MT:
$62.01B
PKX:
₩3.80T
MT:
$34.15B
PKX:
₩4.70T
MT:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKX vs. MT — Risk / Return Rank
PKX
MT
PKX vs. MT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) and ArcelorMittal (MT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKX | MT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.44 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 4.34 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 14.15 | -14.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKX vs. MT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKX drawdown since its inception was -82.11%, smaller than the maximum MT drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKX and MT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKX | MT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.11% | -97.34% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.93% | -28.84% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.70% | -30.83% | -32.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.71% | -45.99% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.23% | -81.10% | +9.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.93% | -59.10% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.28% | -69.36% | +25.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.61% | 8.82% | +9.79% |
Volatility
PKX vs. MT - Volatility Comparison
POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to ArcelorMittal (MT) at 11.90%. This indicates that PKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKX | MT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.92% | 11.90% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.46% | 37.25% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.64% | 43.18% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.76% | 39.86% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 44.45% | -6.42% |
Dividends
PKX vs. MT - Dividend Comparison
PKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than MT's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT ArcelorMittal | 0.82% | 1.21% | 2.16% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% |
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 1.64% | 3.32% | 5.32% | 1.50% | 2.74% | 3.54% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 3.32% | 4.85% |
Financials
PKX vs. MT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between POSCO Holdings Inc. and ArcelorMittal. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PKX vs. MT - Profitability Comparison
PKX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 12.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.5%.
MT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 15.46B and revenue of 15.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
PKX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 496.57M and revenue of 12.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
MT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 15.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
PKX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 318.82M and revenue of 12.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
MT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 575.00M and revenue of 15.46B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PKX and MT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKX has higher volatility (15.92%) compared to MT (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKX dropped -82.11% vs MT's -97.34%.
MT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKX and MT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer