PKX vs. MT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) and ArcelorMittal (MT).

Performance

PKX vs. MT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) and ArcelorMittal (MT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PKX vs. MT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc.	10.17%	27.24%	-52.98%	77.86%	-3.49%	-3.40%	25.14%	-7.86%	-29.68%	51.95%
MT ArcelorMittal	18.84%	100.13%	-16.92%	10.28%	-16.44%	40.29%	30.56%	-14.14%	-35.85%	47.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PKX : $18.98B MT : $41.28B
EPS PKX : $2.03K MT : $4.11
PE Ratio PKX : 0.03 MT : 13.14
PS Ratio PKX : 0.00 MT : 0.67
PB Ratio PKX : 0.00 MT : 0.76
Total Revenue (TTM) PKX : $69.01T MT : $61.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) PKX : $5.17T MT : $33.49B
EBITDA (TTM) PKX : $6.02T MT : $5.91B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than MT's 18.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PKX has underperformed MT with an annualized return of 4.54%, while MT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.

PKX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -15.09%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 18.68%
• 1Y: 26.95%
• 3Y*: -3.11%
• 5Y*: -0.99%
• 10Y*: 4.54%

MT

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: -16.23%
• YTD: 18.84%
• 6M: 42.47%
• 1Y: 89.76%
• 3Y*: 23.79%
• 5Y*: 14.79%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PKX vs. MT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKX

PKX Risk / Return Rank: 62
PKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
PKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PKX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PKX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

MT

MT Risk / Return Rank: 89
MT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKX vs. MT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) and ArcelorMittal (MT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PKX	MT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	2.17	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	2.81	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.36	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	3.14	-2.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.45	12.19	-9.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PKX vs. MT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the MT Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKX and MT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PKX	MT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	2.17	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.38	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.34	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.02	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between PKX and MT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PKX vs. MT - Dividend Comparison

PKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than MT's 1.30% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc.	2.27%	3.32%	5.32%	1.50%	2.74%	3.54%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	1.70%	3.32%	4.85%
MT ArcelorMittal	1.30%	1.21%	2.16%	1.55%	1.45%	0.94%	0.00%	1.14%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	4.03%

Drawdowns

PKX vs. MT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKX drawdown since its inception was -82.11%, smaller than the maximum MT drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKX and MT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PKX	MT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.11%	-97.34%	+15.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.57%	-28.84%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.71%	-45.99%	-22.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.23%	-81.10%	+9.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.61%	-68.57%	+14.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.10%	-69.44%	+25.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.92%	7.44%	+3.48%

Volatility

PKX vs. MT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) is 9.61%, while ArcelorMittal (MT) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that PKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PKX	MT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.61%	17.81%	-8.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.98%	30.59%	-0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.26%	41.51%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.16%	39.12%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.43%	45.01%	-7.58%

Financials

PKX vs. MT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between POSCO Holdings Inc. and ArcelorMittal over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PKX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04T and revenue of 16.76T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.2%.

MT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 14.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.3%.

PKX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 12.62B and revenue of 16.76T, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.

MT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 327.00M and revenue of 14.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

PKX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -225.00B and revenue of 16.76T, resulting in a net margin of -1.3%.

MT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 177.00M and revenue of 14.97B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.