PKX vs. LSAF
PKX (POSCO Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while LSAF (LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF) is Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. Over the past 5 years, PKX returned -4.80%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for LSAF. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PKX vs. LSAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than LSAF's 19.96% return.
PKX
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -10.37%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- -21.67%
- 5Y*
- -4.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.67%
LSAF
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 30.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $265.84K | $205.64K | $201.86K | |
| $19.55M | $20.07M | $24.57M |
PKX vs. LSAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | -0.08% | 27.24% | -52.98% | 77.86% | -3.49% | -3.40% | 25.14% | -7.86% | -17.33% |
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF | 19.96% | 12.01% | 18.09% | 15.48% | -13.12% | 22.75% | 6.92% | 28.35% | -15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKX and LSAF is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PKX and LSAF has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKX vs. LSAF — Risk / Return Rank
PKX
LSAF
PKX vs. LSAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKX | LSAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 4.41 | -4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 14.86 | -14.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKX vs. LSAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKX drawdown since its inception was -82.11%, which is greater than LSAF's maximum drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKX and LSAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKX | LSAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.11% | -41.67% | -40.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.93% | -6.58% | -40.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.70% | -20.26% | -43.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.71% | -24.94% | -43.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.93% | -1.48% | -56.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.28% | -6.21% | -38.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.61% | 1.95% | +16.66% |
Volatility
PKX vs. LSAF - Volatility Comparison
POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) at 4.21%. This indicates that PKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKX | LSAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.92% | 4.21% | +11.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.46% | 10.49% | +23.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.64% | 14.36% | +30.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.76% | 18.38% | +22.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 21.73% | +16.30% |
Dividends
PKX vs. LSAF - Dividend Comparison
PKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than LSAF's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.42% | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.71% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 1.64% | 3.32% | 5.32% | 1.50% | 2.74% | 3.54% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 3.32% | 4.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKX and LSAF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKX has higher volatility (15.92%) compared to LSAF (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKX dropped -82.11% vs LSAF's -41.67%.
LSAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKX and LSAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer