PortfoliosLab logo
MT vs. TTE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MT and TTE is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

MT vs. TTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ArcelorMittal (MT) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MT:

17.19%

TTE:

19.99%

Max Drawdown

MT:

-1.71%

TTE:

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

MT:

-0.20%

TTE:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MT:

$23.19B

TTE:

$129.95B

EPS

MT:

$1.57

TTE:

$5.97

PE Ratio

MT:

19.28

TTE:

9.85

PEG Ratio

MT:

0.66

TTE:

8.58

PS Ratio

MT:

0.38

TTE:

0.68

PB Ratio

MT:

0.45

TTE:

1.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

MT:

$60.96B

TTE:

$191.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MT:

$34.83B

TTE:

$39.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

MT:

$6.03B

TTE:

$39.73B

Returns By Period


MT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TTE

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MT vs. TTE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MT is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MT is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MT is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MT is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MT is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MT is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TTE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TTE is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TTE is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TTE is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TTE is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TTE is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TTE is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MT vs. TTE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

MT vs. TTE - Dividend Comparison

MT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than TTE's 5.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MT
ArcelorMittal
1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
5.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MT vs. TTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MT drawdown since its inception was -1.71%, which is greater than TTE's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MT and TTE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MT vs. TTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

MT vs. TTE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcelorMittal and TotalEnergies SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20212022202320242025
14.80B
47.90B
(MT) Total Revenue
(TTE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MT vs. TTE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ArcelorMittal and TotalEnergies SE over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
29.3%
(MT) Gross Margin
(TTE) Gross Margin
MT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 14.80B and revenue of 14.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

TTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TotalEnergies SE reported a gross profit of 14.05B and revenue of 47.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

MT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 825.00M and revenue of 14.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

TTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TotalEnergies SE reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 47.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

MT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 14.80B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

TTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TotalEnergies SE reported a net income of 3.85B and revenue of 47.90B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.