PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has outperformed VOE with an annualized return of 12.81%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.


PKW

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.41%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
12.81%

VOE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.62%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
2.43%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.75%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and VOE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2006

0.91

The correlation between PKW and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PKW vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
VOE

Financial Services

29.4%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

19.1%
5.7%

Industrials

14.2%
14.0%

Technology

10.8%
10.9%

Healthcare

10.1%
6.3%

Energy

5.6%
12.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
7.9%

Utilities

2.1%
12.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
6.0%

Financial Services

PKW
29.4%
VOE
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.1%
VOE
5.7%

Industrials

PKW
14.2%
VOE
14.0%

Technology

PKW
10.8%
VOE
10.9%

Healthcare

PKW
10.1%
VOE
6.3%

Energy

PKW
5.6%
VOE
12.8%

Communication Services

PKW
4.0%
VOE
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.4%
VOE
7.9%

Utilities

PKW
2.1%
VOE
12.1%

Basic Materials

PKW
1.1%
VOE
5.8%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
VOE
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKWVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.30

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

12.51

-6.05

PKW vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKWVOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.99

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.53

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.56

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Drawdowns

PKW vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-61.50%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-6.93%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-18.45%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-19.70%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-43.18%

+2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-0.16%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-8.35%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.82%

+0.67%

Volatility

PKW vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.58%. This indicates that PKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.58%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

8.13%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

11.47%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

16.03%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

18.83%

+0.95%

PKW vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than VOE's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.90%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKW and VOE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKW has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to VOE (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 12.81% vs 10.55% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.90% for PKW.

PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.07% for VOE.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer