PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.54%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.


PKW

1D
0.23%
1M
2.07%
YTD
3.81%
6M
2.73%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
13.54%

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.81%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and VGT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2006

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between PKW and VGT has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PKW vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
VGT

Financial Services

28.4%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
0.1%

Industrials

14.0%
0.4%

Technology

12.3%
98.5%

Healthcare

10.2%
0.0%

Energy

5.4%
0.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Financial Services

PKW
28.4%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.0%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

PKW
14.0%
VGT
0.4%

Technology

PKW
12.3%
VGT
98.5%

Healthcare

PKW
10.2%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

PKW
5.4%
VGT
0.3%

Communication Services

PKW
4.1%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.2%
VGT

-

Utilities

PKW
2.2%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

PKW
1.0%
VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKWVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.87

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

8.76

-2.26

PKW vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKW vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-54.63%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-16.40%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-27.23%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-35.07%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-35.07%

-5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-7.71%

+6.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-7.95%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

5.36%

-2.86%

Volatility

PKW vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) is 3.39%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that PKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

11.39%

-8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

18.58%

-8.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

22.72%

-9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

25.55%

-8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

24.77%

-5.02%

PKW vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.81%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKW and VGT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to PKW (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.49% vs 13.54% for PKW. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PKW has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.49% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

PKW has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

PKW is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer