PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 12.81%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.


PKW

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.41%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
12.81%

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
2.43%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and RSP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2006

0.92

The correlation between PKW and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PKW vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
RSP

Financial Services

29.4%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

19.1%
9.9%

Industrials

14.2%
14.1%

Technology

10.8%
19.6%

Healthcare

10.1%
11.0%

Energy

5.6%
4.5%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
6.5%

Utilities

2.1%
6.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
6.0%

Financial Services

PKW
29.4%
RSP
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.1%
RSP
9.9%

Industrials

PKW
14.2%
RSP
14.1%

Technology

PKW
10.8%
RSP
19.6%

Healthcare

PKW
10.1%
RSP
11.0%

Energy

PKW
5.6%
RSP
4.5%

Communication Services

PKW
4.0%
RSP
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.4%
RSP
6.5%

Utilities

PKW
2.1%
RSP
6.1%

Basic Materials

PKW
1.1%
RSP
4.1%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
RSP
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKWRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.49

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

9.48

-3.02

PKW vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKWRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.70

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.52

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.65

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.57

-0.05

Drawdowns

PKW vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-59.92%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-7.85%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-17.81%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-21.38%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-39.04%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-0.38%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-6.65%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.06%

+0.43%

Volatility

PKW vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that PKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.56%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

8.29%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

11.56%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

16.18%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

18.35%

+1.43%

PKW vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.90%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PKW and RSP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PKW has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 12.81% vs 11.86% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.90% for PKW.

PKW is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer